Tuesday, July 23, 2013

A Look Through The Lenses

Tyler White
Ms. Wagener
AP English Language
23 July 2013

A Look Through The Lenses

   Immanuel Kant saw philosophy and life through a new perspective. He said that everyone perceived things differently and nothing was really different just the way we saw it was. He explained that if you were to put on a pair of red sun-glasses you would see everything in red and if you wore them long enough that's how your mind would start to see things. He called this the "Red Glasses Experiment". He claimed that certain conditions governed how we experienced the world. 
   To think like this puts a whole new perspective on the way we look at things. As we grow older our outlook on life and how we wish to live changes. As with water into a pitcher, our mind and the way we see things adapt to our 'forms of intuition'. Kant claimed that we cannot imagine what the world is like for everyone. We can only imagine what life is like for me. Kant described that we cannot have an understanding for das Ding an sich, or the thing in itself, we can only be certain of how they appear to us. 
   I believe Kant's reasoning was brilliant! I think he is completely right. Someone sitting next to me looking at a half-empty glass might claim that it is half full. While, on the other hand someone else might claim it is half-empty. Why is this? Because as Kant explained, we all see and perceive things differently. Kant also said that we use reason to come up with answers to questions. Alberto used the example of a ball rolling into a room. If that were to happen to me I would turn to see where it came from. This is because I am a human being and the law of causality is part of who I am. As we grow older our perspective on things change. We might look at the same glass twenty years past the time we first looked at it and claim it is half empty other than half full. Kant believed that the 'tint' on our glasses changed as the conditions changed. 

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Side Note

Side Note


This is a link to the conversation that I hinted at in my last blog post. 
I hope you will get as much insight out of it as I did. 

Christianization of Philosophy

Tyler White
Ms. Wagener
AP English Language
7 July 2013

Christianization of Philosophy

    In all honesty I do not entirely recall how the two philosophers really christianized Aristotle and Plato. I had to re-read that section. I did come to some conclusions, however. Two great philosophers, Aristotle and Plato, had not really been around Christianity so, they did not base their teachings and their thoughts with the fact that there could be a higher being. But, whenever St. Augustine and Aquinas came around they 'christianized' the teachings of Aristotle and Plato. 
    St. Augustine looked at Plato's teachings and agreed with them. He did, however, bring God into them. Plato believed that the world had always existed and St. Augustine knew that God had created the world in seven literal days. So, St. Augustine came to the conclusion that the 'idea' of Earth had always existed in God's thought processes. Without St. Augustine Plato's teaching would have almost all but been forgotten. Aquinas did something altogether different than what St. Augustine did with Plato's teachings. 
    Aquinas stated that Aristotle did not make the connection to Christianity because he didn't know what it was since he had not been introduced to it in his time of philosophy. Aquinas stated that whenever Aristotle mentioned a 'higher being' that surely he meant God. But, if you think about it, that makes no logical sense. In the book Sophie's World  it states that there are two ways of life. You can look at something and think it is one thing when in reality it is something completely different.
   So, for Aquinas to state that was a very bold move and on that I was very pleased with. I could look at some of today's very pronounced atheists that claim there is a higher being of some sort, and claim that they believe in God. When very Christian, Ben Stein, approached very pronounced atheist, Richard Dawkins, Richard was at a loss of words when asked about a higher being. Even Richard admitted that there is a possibility that the world could have been created by intelligent design. So for Aquinas to assume that Aristotle may have believed in a higher being, God, I would agree with his assumption.